Content Comparison

Discuss warehouse bins and default input bin

• A total of about 50,000 bins with Arrowquip and Yakta combined

• GF recommends using the old bins and just rename them to keep the system clean Arrowquip decided to ignore this for now because it is too time-consuming and to just move forward expressed concerns with this unusually large number of bins.

Data for input bins (one for Yakta and one for Arrowquip)

• Rick provided the data for parts they manufactured in-house

• We only have Arrowquip data, not Yakta

• Purchase parts that are received and put-away we still need

Only VMI will have a default input bin / 70-80% of components are not VMI, those don’t have default input bins

• Work line for VMI component will go to a Default Bin

• Work line non-VMI component will go to ???

If we allow WO to consume automatically from any bin, would it be a concern for on-hand qty?

Explain GF default bin process through WO example

• It seems like Arrowquip components on WO can be throughout the warehouse and assembly

• Main Question: We need default input bin for every work line, how do we make it happen?

Discuss BOM revisions: In Sage they compare BOMs, but in GF we create a new revised BOM which is safer (Formula version) / Derek will look over the documentation on this

Supply Plan:

• Issue is that VMI items appears on supply planning for WO

  • To exclude items from supply planning , make sure replenishment system is blank

    • All VMI items should have blank replenishment system

• Some items are showing as WO when it shouldn’t be

  • It may be because when we got the raw data, the Product Source was labeled as Manufacturing

  • Need to decide who has permission to modify SKUs

Show mobile scanning feature (scan shop floor)

• Worried about the amount of clicks needed on desktop to close a work order / Should scanning be phase 1?Do we want to report output every step along with the time or one time per WO? one time per WO just like Sage

There can be automation to finish WOs